Skip To Navigation Skip To Content Skip To Footer

    The MGMA membership renewal portal is experiencing intermittent issues. We are working on a fix. If you're unable to renew, please call 877.275.6462 ext. 1888 or email service@mgma.com to renew.

    MGMA Stat
    Home > MGMA Stat > MGMA Stat
    MGMA Government Affairs
    MGMA Government Affairs

    MGMA Government Affairs recently hosted the Biden Administration’s top health technology official, Micky Tripathi, PhD, MPP, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, for a June 17 webinar, “Information blocking requirements now in effect: Is your practice in compliance?”
     

    Background

    Information blocking was included in the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016. The Cures Act defined “information blocking” and authorized the Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) to identify, through rulemaking by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), “reasonable and necessary activities that do not constitute information blocking” and identified the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) as the office to investigate claims of information blocking.

    The Cures Act also prescribed penalties for information blocking, leading ONC to implement a complaint process for reporting potential information blocking actions and confidentiality protections for complaints.

    ONC’s final rule implementing the Cures Act included a variety of information blocking requirements for healthcare providers, which went into effect on April 5, 2021. However, compliance questions regarding several provisions of the final rule have lingered since it took effect. MGMA Government Affairs recently released an Information Blocking Toolkit for Medical Groups, summarizing the regulatory provisions of the rule and action steps that organizations can take for compliance.

    A June 15 MGMA Stat poll found that 51% of healthcare leaders say they need more government guidance to help comply with these information blocking rules, while 26% responded “unsure.” Only 23% of respondents said “no.” The poll had 633 applicable responses.

    Common areas cited by respondents for further guidance included:

    • Defining “timeliness” as it relates to requirements for giving patients access to their records
    • Details and/or use cases on acceptable and non-acceptable standards
    • The extent to which existing patient portals satisfy the patient record access requirements.

    Additional resources

    • Information Blocking Toolkit for Medical Groups — This advocacy resource summarizes the regulatory provisions of the 21st Century Cures Act’s information blocking rule and offers action steps for medical groups to take to ensure compliance.
    • MGMA’s Washington Connection — Sign up for MGMA Government Affairs’ weekly email newsletter for the latest regulatory and legislative updates from Washington, D.C.
    • Do you have any best practices or success stories to share on this topic? Please let us know by emailing us at connection@mgma.com.

    JOIN MGMA STAT

    Our ability at MGMA to provide great resources, education and advocacy depends on a strong feedback loop with healthcare leaders. To be part of this effort, sign up for MGMA Stat and make your voice heard in our weekly polls. Sign up by texting “STAT” to 33550 or visit mgma.com/stat. Polls will be sent to your phone via text message.
     


    Explore Related Content

    More MGMA Stats

    Ask MGMA
    An error has occurred. The page may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙