Skip To Navigation Skip To Content Skip To Footer

    The MGMA membership renewal portal is experiencing intermittent issues. We are working on a fix. If you're unable to renew, please call 877.275.6462 ext. 1888 or email service@mgma.com to renew.

    Rater8 - You make patients happy. We make sure everyone knows about it. Try it for free.
    MGMA Stat
    Home > MGMA Stat > MGMA Stat
    Cristy Good
    Cristy Good, MPH, MBA, CPC, CMPE

    Collaboration among physicians, practice administrators, legal and financial experts is key to designing fair, transparent and compliant compensation structures.

    According to a March 26, 2024, MGMA Stat poll, six in 10 (60%) medical group leaders say their physicians participate in developing the compensation methodology in the organization, while only 38% responded “no” and another 2% were unsure. The poll had 455 applicable responses.

    These results show a slight decrease in physician participation in compensation methodology development compared to a June 2019 MGMA Stat poll which found more than two-thirds (67%) of groups had physicians involved.

    It is important to align compensation plans with the practice’s strategic goals, such as quality metrics and quality improvement initiatives. By involving physicians in the process and tailoring compensation plans to suit individual preferences, practices leaders can:

    • Foster trust and reduce potential conflicts or grievances related to compensation
    • Promote transparency and fairness
    • Possibly motivate physicians to achieve practice goals
    • Increase engagement by giving them a “voice” in determining their rewards
    • Increase physician satisfaction and retention
    • Provide a sense of ownership and accountability for practice performance.

    The medical group leaders responding “yes” to this latest poll noted several different ways their physicians play a role in developing compensation methodology:

    • Being part of a formal physician compensation committee within the organization
    • Ongoing physician surveys
    • Leading discussion on developing bonus metrics
    • Participation in annual strategic planning meetings.

    Among respondents who answered “no,” a sizable group noted reliance on competitive benchmarking data and analysis over clinician input due to salaried compensation models for employed physicians. Some who answered “no” signaled that they seek input from all providers around compensation, but that final recommendations on the methodology and approvals are done by senior leadership and the board.

    Key considerations

    Developing compensation plans requires time, resources and expertise. Things to remember when partnering with physicians on their compensation plan:

    • Conflicts of interest may arise if prioritizing personal financial gains over patients' best interests or the practice.
    • Performance metrics or productivity measures can introduce complexity in compensation structures.
    • Physicians may lack expertise in compensation planning which could result in compensation plans that are not the best fit for either party involved.
    • Compensation plans must comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, including anti-kickback statutes, Stark Law, and fair market value standards.

    MGMA tools: wRVU variance calculator

    MGMA offers a wRVU Variance Calculator that allows practices to calculate the impact of wRVU  based on CPT® code and volume for both individual and group providers for 2022, 2023 and 2024. Changes in wRVU reimbursement directly affect physician compensation, especially in practices where compensation is tied to productivity measures.

    Reduced wRVU reimbursement can lower physician compensation or necessitate compensation adjustments to meet revenue targets. An increase in wRVU reimbursement may result in higher physician compensation or bonuses, necessitating proper budgeting.

    Practices must closely monitor reimbursement trends and take proactive steps to mitigate the impact of wRVU reimbursement fluctuations on their performance and sustainability.

    Conclusion

    Regular reviews of physician compensation agreements are crucial to maintain fairness and market alignment. Changes in healthcare laws, regulations or compliance requirements may necessitate updates to compensation agreements. Fostering collaboration between physicians and administrators encourages developing compensation plans that effectively align incentives with practice objectives, boosting physician satisfaction and engagement.

    Join MGMA Stat

    Our ability at MGMA to provide great resources, education and advocacy depends on a strong feedback loop with healthcare leaders. To be part of this effort, sign up for MGMA Stat — by texting “STAT” to 33550 or visiting mgma.com/stat — and make your voice heard in our weekly polls. Polls will be sent to your phone via text message.

    Additional resources:

    Cristy Good

    Written By

    Cristy Good, MPH, MBA, CPC, CMPE

    Cristy Good, MPH, MBA, CPC, CMPE, is a Senior Industry Advisor at MGMA, with expertise in practice management, healthcare operations, revenue cycle management and project management. She has more than 20 years of experience in medical practice administration and financial management. Prior to joining MGMA, Cristy was a credentialed trainer with EPIC and helped prepare providers for one of the largest EHR implementations. For more than five years, she was an administrator with a large health system where she oversaw the strategic and daily operations for multiple outpatient medical practices and also spent six months working for a private home health agency. In addition, she has more than 10 years of clinical laboratory experience.


    Explore Related Content

    More MGMA Stats

    Ask MGMA
    An error has occurred. The page may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙