Skip To Navigation Skip To Content Skip To Footer

    The MGMA membership renewal portal is experiencing intermittent issues. We are working on a fix. If you're unable to renew, please call 877.275.6462 ext. 1888 or email service@mgma.com to renew.

    Rater8 - You make patients happy. We make sure everyone knows about it. Try it for free.
    Insight Article
    Home > Articles > Article
    Pamela Ballou-Nelson
    Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, CMPE

    The ongoing shift from fee-for-service reimbursement to value-based payment and population health models will change clinician and staff compensation models over time. The underlying concepts of payment reform will tie payments to evidence and outcomes rather than per unit of service. Reimbursement for coordination of care, accountability for results and management of care across settings, as well as bundled payments for physician and hospital services, will create new incentives.

    David Nash, MD, MBA, FACP, recently addressed the fourth-year medical students at the Sidney Kimmel Medical College in Philadelphia on the topic of “How Your Practice World is Changing.” He informed the graduating students,

    “Transparency and accountability will be major themes as we move forward—basically, “No outcome, no income.” This will require fundamental changes in culture—such as practicing based on evidence, reducing unexplained clinical variation, reducing adherence to the notion of professional autonomy, continuously measuring and closing the feedback loop and engaging with patients across the continuum of care.”
    May 17, 2017

    Pay-for-performance is an important element of good management. The question, however, is “What kind of pay for what kind of performance?” It is easy to forget why we pay people. In our desire to stay on an equal level with others in the field, we lose track of real value and performance. Current pay often reflects past performance, not current or expected performance. Generally speaking, compensation plans are designed to reward long-term as well as short-term performance, encourage retention, recognize special needs of an organization, be based on the achievement of both financial and non-financial objectives and, in general, create value for patients/clients.

    How can a practice set up performance-based compensation for clinicians and office staff aligned with practice mission and required outcome measures? The first step is to define, in measurable terms, your mission objectives and perceived value outcome measures. Reasonable incentives are geared toward short-term goals (such as process compliance, team contribution) and higher incentives for long-term goals (such as practice transformation to a patient-centered medical home or yearly preventive service measures met).

    Geisinger Health System, a physician-led healthcare system of northeastern and central Pennsylvania, recently announced a move away from incentive pay to a straight salary compensation plan for their clinicians. The compensation is based on their cultural mission and values and above-average performance. “Physicians don't need incentives to do the right thing for patients,” said Jaewon Ryu, MD, JD, Geisinger's, executive vice president and chief medical officer.

    This statement is of interest to me; one I believe should be true. Time will tell if this works for Geisinger.

    There are four essential management processes that collectively govern the adoption of value-based compensation.

    • First, the practice develops a strategy to maximize value.
    • Second, it translates this strategy into short- and long-term performance targets defined in terms of the key value drivers. Employees are rewarded on quarterly basis for short-term goals.
    • Third, it develops action plans and budgets to define the steps that will be taken over the next year or so to achieve these targets.
    • Fourth, it puts performance measurement and incentive systems in place to monitor performance against targets and to encourage all staff to meet their goals. Decide to only reward above-average performance so you can continue to be an above-average practice.
       

    Value-based management can best be understood as a union between a value-creation mindset and the management processes and systems that are necessary to translate that mindset into action. Taken alone, either element is insufficient. Taken together, they can have a huge and sustained impact.

    Respect and team cohesiveness are also outcomes of value-based management and should be included in overall goals. If you want better-performing clinicians and staff and a more successful practice, you need to consider how you are measuring your employees and the growth of the practice. Measure and track the actions you want to see and reward people based on this, not just on some arbitrary formula. (A word of caution as you prepare compensation plans: There are limits within which pay can elicit performance. Above a certain amount of incentive, pay does not incentivize or even influence performance.)

    In summary, a well-structured compensation plan communicates practice mission and value objectives to clinicians and staff. The focus of value-based compensation should not be on methodology, but rather on the why you want to change your practice culture and how to do so. All staff must embrace value-based thinking as an improved way of making decisions if value-based care is to truly become integrated into your organization.


    Click here to learn more information about the MGMA Health Care Consulting Group's compensation planning services.

    Pamela Ballou-Nelson

    Written By

    Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, CMPE

    Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, has more than 30 years of experience in healthcare management, focusing on practice process transformation, patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), workflow analysis, quality measures, care management, population health and patient activation across the continuum of care. Nelson has worked with both provider and payer organizations to help them work toward alternative care and payment models. As clinical quality director for Adventist Health Network in Chicago, Nelson was responsible for leading physicians and hospital directors in their clinical integration process. Nelson has also worked with numerous commercial payers on quality outcomes and effectiveness measures, including compliance with Medicaid care management programs, along with Medicaid insurance contracts and high-risk and dual-eligible patient programs. She has also trained, advised and mentored more than 80 practices in various levels of readiness, preparing them for value-based payment reform, process improvement, improved quality outcomes and increased efficiency through PCMH recognition with 2011 and 2014 standards. She has a BSN from the University of Utah, an MA from Wheaton College, and an MS and PhD in Public Health from Walden University. In addition, she is an NCQA 2014 PCMH certified content expert and frequently speaks on PCMH transformation for accountable care organizations and population health initiatives.


    Explore Related Content

    More Insight Articles

    Explore Related Topics

    Ask MGMA
    An error has occurred. The page may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙