Skip To Navigation Skip To Content Skip To Footer

    The MGMA membership renewal portal is experiencing intermittent issues. We are working on a fix. If you're unable to renew, please call 877.275.6462 ext. 1888 or email service@mgma.com to renew.

    Insight Article
    Home > Articles > Article
    Pamela Ballou-Nelson
    Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, CMPE

    We have reached the tipping point, and all roads lead to healthcare reform. Health plans, government programs, employers and organizations of all sizes, shapes and values are working together to transform the U.S healthcare system into one of the new models that yield consistently higher-quality care while stemming costs. While healthcare is delivered locally and every population has its own health needs, education levels, economic profiles and cultural attributes, key components impact the business of the new healthcare models regardless of where they are located. Here are a few of those key components for which your practice must prepare:

    1. Recalibrating compensation methods to reward clinicians and staff who deliver safe, efficient and high-quality care. This shift will require new data sources. Payment models will move away from traditional fee-for service reimbursement to payments based on value, introducing more incentives for cost efficiency and meeting outcome metrics. The Medical Economics Reader’s Rector Survey poll showed concern over new reimbursement models as the biggest challenge in 2016 and beyond. The questions surrounding the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) for part B payments were:

    “How will the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) determine physician scores under MIPS, which requires a zero to 100 composite score?
    At what level will scoring take place? By practice or by individual doctors?

    Will the new pay-for-performance focus drive more doctors into alternative payment models (APMs) such as accountable care organizations (ACOs) and patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs)”?

    2. Instilling accountability across the care continuum to increase coordination among all parties involved in providing care (including patient hand-offs), in whatever settings care is delivered. Care coordination and management across the continuum will reduce emergency room visits and prevent hospitalizations and re-hospitalizations. While practices must assume greater risk, with that risk comes greater control over decision making. This fact alone could be a major theoretical shift in most practices. With at-risk payments or even episodes or bundles, care decisions will reside not with the payer but with clinicians. Care plans and care pathways will become increasingly important to maintain consistency and avoid over- or underuse in treatment options.

    3. Mastering the metrics. Clinicians will get unexceptional results if they don’t enter every visit mindful of metrics. Practices must challenge themselves, staff and patients to continuously improve.

    4. Engaging consumers, understanding patient activation by providing them with the right amount and level of information so they can make informed decisions and more actively participate.

    Changing models to improve the healthcare system and the health of our populations requires a commitment to ongoing collaboration. This collaboration is not just between payers and providers in traditional hospital and physician settings, but also in local communities and among individuals, employers and other supporters of care. The collective impact will bring about new models that yield consistently higher-quality care while stemming costs.

    If you have questions about staffing or need additional help, contact Pamela Ballou-Nelson at pballounelson@mgma.com

    Pamela Ballou-Nelson

    Written By

    Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, CMPE

    Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, has more than 30 years of experience in healthcare management, focusing on practice process transformation, patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), workflow analysis, quality measures, care management, population health and patient activation across the continuum of care. Nelson has worked with both provider and payer organizations to help them work toward alternative care and payment models. As clinical quality director for Adventist Health Network in Chicago, Nelson was responsible for leading physicians and hospital directors in their clinical integration process. Nelson has also worked with numerous commercial payers on quality outcomes and effectiveness measures, including compliance with Medicaid care management programs, along with Medicaid insurance contracts and high-risk and dual-eligible patient programs. She has also trained, advised and mentored more than 80 practices in various levels of readiness, preparing them for value-based payment reform, process improvement, improved quality outcomes and increased efficiency through PCMH recognition with 2011 and 2014 standards. She has a BSN from the University of Utah, an MA from Wheaton College, and an MS and PhD in Public Health from Walden University. In addition, she is an NCQA 2014 PCMH certified content expert and frequently speaks on PCMH transformation for accountable care organizations and population health initiatives.


    Explore Related Content

    More Insight Articles

    Explore Related Topics

    Ask MGMA
    An error has occurred. The page may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙